The conflict in Sudan isn't just a domestic squabble; it's a full-blown international issue, according to Justice Minister Dr. Abdullah Dirif. This bold statement sets the stage for a deeper look at the complexities of the situation, and the challenges facing the Sudanese government. But what exactly is happening? And what does the future hold? Let's dive in.
Dr. Dirif, speaking at the Doha Forum on December 6-7, 2025, didn't mince words. He framed the situation as an 'external aggression,' highlighting the horrific actions of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia, whom he directly accused of committing crimes against innocent civilians. He also called out the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for supporting the RSF.
During the Doha Forum, themed "Upholding Justice: From Promises to Tangible Reality," the Minister emphasized the RSF's recent provocative moves, such as declaring a so-called authority in Nyala. This action was met with swift condemnation from the international community. The United Nations, the African Union Peace and Security Council, the Arab League, and many other nations all reiterated their support for Sudan's legitimate government.
Dr. Dirif made it clear: the RSF has no place in Sudan's future, either politically or militarily. He stressed that the unity of Sudan depends on the solidarity of its people and their backing of the Armed Forces until the RSF is dismantled. He also praised the civilian government, led by Prime Minister Dr. Kamil Idris, for its ongoing efforts to protect civilians and provide essential humanitarian aid.
Here's where it gets controversial: The Justice Minister also highlighted Sudan's willingness to engage in peace initiatives. He mentioned the IGAD initiative, which stumbled due to internal disagreements, and the Jeddah Platform, where a Declaration of Principles was announced in May 2023. However, he noted that the RSF violated the ceasefire on the very first day, showing a blatant disregard for international humanitarian law.
Sudan is actively pursuing bilateral dialogues with the United States, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, and other nations. Dr. Dirif stressed that any credible initiative must address the core concerns of the Sudanese people, specifically the disarmament of the RSF. Military arrangements must include the militia's withdrawal from cities and civilian areas, regrouping in designated camps agreed upon with mediators, and the restoration of Sudanese police and civilian institutions to resume governance and public services. Only after these steps can further measures be considered.
Dr. Dirif concluded that initiatives failing to meet these requirements and align with the government's roadmap are neither serious nor effective and will yield no meaningful results.
What do you think? Do you agree with the Justice Minister's assessment of the situation? What are the most important steps to achieving lasting peace in Sudan? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
